Co-Creation Template
Use the Co-Creation Template to convey your ideal solutions through symbolic representations.
About the Co-creation Template
This template serves as a tool for people to express their ideas through visual representation. It provides a set of essential elements that make it easy and efficient to communicate visions.
By examining these creations, one can identify both explicit and implicit needs. For instance, a human resources team might use symbols to depict people and various work scenarios, such as in-person, remote, or hybrid, to envision their ideal work environment. The result is a set of informative artifacts that reflect people's wants and expectations.
Benefits of using the template
Reveal individuals' wants and desires.
Discover hidden and unfulfilled needs.
Question your assumptions.
Generate models to guide future endeavors.
How to use the template in Miro
Provide an overview of the subject matter and ask participants to introduce themselves.
Encourage participants to select a background image from the options provided.
Encourage participants to position building block elements on the background image.
Encourage participants to further develop their vision.
Request participants to describe their creations. Actively listen and record observations.
Setup
Select a subject for examination.
Invite a group of stakeholders to be participants.
Engage stakeholders as contributors.
Useful tips
Use the icon library to discover more building elements.
Set a time constraint of 15-30 minutes for illustration.
Pay close attention to teams' desires and requirements.
Get started with this template right now.
How Might We Template
It's crucial to ask the right questions to find the best solutions. Skilled critical thinkers can uncover the underlying complexities of a problem instead of just accepting it at face value. One way to encourage this type of thinking is by using statement starters, such as the How Might We Template. These tools can help you explore more open-ended problems and have more productive discussions, ultimately leading to the most effective solutions.
Card Sorting Template
Works best for:
Desk Research, UX Design, Brainstorming
Card sorting is a brainstorming technique typically used by design teams but applicable to any brainstorm or team. The method is designed to facilitate more efficient and creative brainstorms. In a card sorting exercise, you and your team create groups out of content, objects, or ideas. You begin by labeling a deck of cards with information related to the topic of the brainstorm. Working as a group or individuals, you then sort the cards in a way that makes sense to you, then label each group with a short description. Card sorting allows you to form unexpected but meaningful connections between ideas.
Design Review Template
Works best for:
Design
Constructive feedback is a valuable skill. The Design Review Template provides a structured approach for effective conversations. Critiques promote collaboration and drive improvement, inspiring all participants. It's an accessible way to involve people beyond your core team.
Empathy Map by Invoke
Works best for:
Market Research, Research & Design
The Empathy Map template is perfect for understanding user behavior and motivations. It helps teams capture insights into what users think, feel, and do, ensuring your designs meet their needs. Ideal for UX and product teams.
Service Blueprint by Bruna Plentz
Works best for:
Research & Design
Utilize the Service Blueprint template to visualize and optimize your service processes. This template captures interactions between customers and service elements, helping you identify areas for improvement. It's ideal for teams aiming to enhance service delivery by aligning processes, identifying inefficiencies, and fostering a comprehensive understanding of the service journey. Perfect for creating a cohesive service strategy.
SUS Evaluation
Works best for:
Design, UX
To assess the emotional experience of users, use the SUS Evaluation Template. This involves conducting a survey with a set of questions where respondents rate their level of agreement on a scale ranging from 'Strongly Disagree' to 'Strongly Agree.' These questions evaluate various aspects of the user experience, such as ease of use, aesthetics, and overall satisfaction. This approach is valuable for comparing design iterations and evaluating the effectiveness of products and services.